Complaints and conflict resolution

When a complaint is received about any of the articles, it is reviewed and the right to reply is given to the person who presents the complaint. For this, there is the section: note to the editor, in which they can publish clarifications on published articles.
The resolution of issues such as the case of very different evaluations is resolved by obtaining a third evaluation, in any case, the editorial committee decides on the evaluations based on the expertise in each area of ​​knowledge. Any other conflict will be resolved by decision of the editorial committee.

Retractions

The Journal follows the recommendations issued by COPE in order to avoid bad scientific practices, and is willing to publish corrections, clarifications, and retractions when necessary according to the following types of errors:
1. Major errors (forgery, fabrication or plagiarism): In the event that a published article presents substantive errors detected by the author and that threaten scientific quality, you may request withdrawal or correction. However, if plagiarism, previous publication, unethical conduct or error are detected by third parties, it is the author's obligation to retract it publicly, which will immediately result in withdrawal or public correction. The public correction or retraction will be made in the next issue.
2. Minor errors (errors in sampling, procedures, or data analysis, failure to reproduce results, accidental omission of information about methods or data analysis): When an error or inaccuracy is discovered significant in the published document, it is mandatory to notify the journal and retract or correct the document.